Worker #3116 to Replace Daniel Who? in “James Bond: Casino Royale”

JAMES Bond fans - infuriated that suave Pierce Brosnan, 52, was dumped for beady-eyed blond Daniel Craig, 37 - won’t be won over by the photo at right of the new 007 showing off his hairless chest. Fans have created a Web site, craignotbond.com, asking how the tall, dark superspy can be played by an actor with the face of a boxer and a penchant for playing killers, cads and gigolos. They were even more upset when they learned that Craig can’t even drive the classic Bond car, an Aston Martin DB5, because he can’t handle a stick shift.
(New York Post)

NEW James Bond Daniel Craig has already failed to make the grade as a tough guy - after a villain knocked out two of his teeth in his FIRST fight scene.
(Sunday Mirror)

Reasons Hollywood should cast Worker #3116 in Casino Royale instead of Daniel Who?

  1. Worker #3116 can drive stick shift. He loves it. Worker #3116 will drive the shit out of that Aston Martin DB5 and there will be no confusion that he knows what he is doing.
  2. Worker #3116 has already had his two front teeth broken in an ice skating tragedy. He is not a pussy about this, and his fake teeth are so strong he can eat apples and everything. Also fight.
  3. Worker #3116 has neither history nor penchant for playing killers, cads, or gigolos. Audiences will not be confused that he is a hero.
  4. Worker #3116 does not have the face of a boxer. Yet (please see post: “Face Legal.”)
  5. Worker #3116 is not beady eyed.
  6. Worker #3116 owns his own tuxedo. It is gray with silver accents, but this is because we are dealing with the James Bond of the future, and in the future all clothes are silver. They are faster that way.
  7. Picture Worker #3116 sitting at a roulette table: “Put a bunch of these chips on #12.” Picture the roulette ball landing on number 12: “It is as I expected.” Worker #3116 is very cool, and he is great at gambling.
  8. The public is ready for a Jewish playboy. Have you seen Seth Cohen on FOX’s hit teen drama The O.C.? Worker #3116 is the Seth Cohen of the international espionage jet set. Or will be when you cast him as James Bond instead of Daniel Who? in Casino Royale.
  9. Worker #3116 will do his own stunts as long as there are no knives involved. Worker #3116 hates knives. But if it did come down to a knife stunt, he would be willing to work on overcoming this fear for the sake of James Bond: Casino Royale. Daniel Who? has not displayed such willingness to overcome obstacles.
  10. Worker #3116 can take a punch (please see post: “Face Legal.”)
  11. When Worker #3116 was in summer camp he did very well at the shooting range. He believes his muscle memory from summer camp will serve him well in scenes that involve shooting. Same for swimming.
  12. Unlike with Daniel Who?, there is no worker3116notbond.com website to cause bad publicity for the film.
  13. Worker #3116 is availble for filming IMMEDIATELY.
  • darkpony says:

    I noticed you left off the most important entry:
    14. james bond likes girls.

    I wonder why?

  • Worker #3116 says:

    Brokeback James Bond Casino Royale.

  • astonished says:

    Has worker #3116 even read a james bond book? the blonde hair aside, Daniel Craig is alot closer to the mark than most who have taken the role on. I for one think he’ll do the role justice by putting the original character back into Bond, as Ian Fleming intended

  • Mee says:

    Time for a change.

    We are tired of the stereo-typed too good looking, almost fenimine, Bond types. We need change. We want an new up to date Bond type, mascoline and cool.

    Hope next Bond will be a Mads Mikkelsen type Bond.

    Mads Mikkelsen is cool, Daniel Craig is not ! ( and then he is blond - aughh ).

    Well -we will se in the cinema ……

  • Gen. Gogol says:

    No response to worker #3116 for Bond. Personally I’m upset that Clive Owen wasn’t chosen.

    As for the Movie Bond looking more like the Book Bond, it would be a big mistake. They simply aren’t the same characters and the stories have always been different. Let movie BOnd continue to be suave, emotionally uneffected, brutal, and chauvinistic.

    Why aren’t we screaming about Judy Dench? M should be a man. Ruins the entire relationship and banter between the characters.

  • Robert says:

    Daniel Craig will suck as James Bond.
    The guy is ugly as hell, and not even that great of an actor either.

    Pierce Brosnan was the best Bond since Sean Connery, and he should have made a couple of more Bond films.

    Eon should either bring Pierce Brosnan back or beg Hugh Jackman to become Bond.

  • Disgusted says:

    I am so disgusted with the choice of Daniel Craig as the new James bond. This movie will suck for the following reasons:

    -A gay James Bond goes totally against the character
    -James Bond cant be blond
    -Craig cant even drive a stick shift, and wont be able to use the Aston Martin
    -James Bond now drinks beer instead of a vodka martini
    -M is a woman
    -The original Q isnt there
    -Craig is too “sensitive”
    -Daniel Craig sucks as an actor
    James Bond is supposed to be a handsom, masculine heartthrob with a cavalier attitude. This ugly wimp of an actor cannot possibly live up to the character.

    I say, either bring back Pierce Brosnan, or Hugh Jackman, I agree wouldnt be a bad choice.

  • Feial says:
  • Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. All material copyright of Worker #3116